Teaching Lab All Partners Report: Matched

2020-2021 Report

Background

In SY20-21, Teaching Lab administered online diagnostic and follow-up surveys of educators participating in Teaching Lab’s professional learning in order to measure growth and improvement in three different areas: 1) Educator Mindsets and Beliefs, 2) School Environment, and 3) Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge. There were 9 educators who completed the diagnostic survey, 9 educators who completed the follow-up survey, and 9 educators who completed both.

Summary of Results

Methodology and Presentation of Results

We have provided two types of results for each section: The results in the first three columns of the table refer to the overall group averages. We provide the group average for the diagnostic and follow-up surveys as well as the percentage point change (increase or decrease) over this time. It is important to note that the group that completed the diagnostic survey and the group that completed the follow-up survey are different in size. The results in the fourth column reflect the percentage of educators who improved their responses or sustained the highest level response from the diagnostic to follow-up survey. This group of educators is the same for both surveys and is smaller in size.

Section 1: Mindsets and Beliefs

Educators were asked a series of questions about their mindsets toward instruction and students on a 5-point Likert scale from 1- Strongly disagree to 5- Strongly agree. The questions focused on four core constructs surrounding mindsets and beliefs, specifically the recognition of race and culture, growth mindsets, high expectations, and taking accountability for equitable instruction.


1
Methodological note: Mindsets and Beliefs questions were scored in the following way: for positively coded items, “1” and “2” were worth 0 points, “3” was worth 1 point, and “4” and “5” were worth 2 points. This was reversed for negatively coded items where “4” and “5” were 0 points, “3” was 1 point, and “1” and “2” were 2 points. Educators were considered to have improved if their score on the follow-up survey was higher than that of the diagnostic survey. (e.g., they responded “4” on the diagnostic and “5” in the follow-up for positively coded items, they responded “4” on the diagnostic and “3” in the follow-up for negatively coded items). Educators who responded with the highest-level responses (“4” and “5” or “1” and “2”, depending on the item) on both the diagnostic and follow-up surveys were considered to have sustained equitable mindsets, growth mindsets, high expectations, and/or accountability for equitable instruction.

     

Educators’ Averages Scores on Equitable Mindsets and Beliefs, by Survey Administration
% of Educators with Equitable Mindsets & Beliefs
% of Educators that Improved or Sustained
2
Diagnostic Survey
1
Follow-up Survey
1
Percentage Point Change
1
Overall score 74% 64% −10% 68%
Recognition of race & culture 56% 44% −12% 44%
Holding growth mindsets 50% 56% +6% 61%
Having high expectations and beliefs 11% 11% +0% 22%
Taking accountability for equitable instruction 74% 52% −23% 67%

1 Note: The number of observations varies between items from 9 to 9

2 n = 9

The plot illustrates educators’ average scores from the diagnostic and follow-up surveys, which corresponds to the information in the first three columns of the table. Orange represents the diagnostic scores, and blue represents the follow-up scores. The arrows represent the directionality, showing an increase or decrease in the average scores.

Section 2: School Environment

Educators were asked about their school environment, including culture and climate on a 5-point Likert scale from 1- Strongly disagree to 5- Strongly agree. Specifically, educators were asked about trust and connectedness to other educators, their role in shaping their own professional learning, and confidence in implementing the curriculum in a way that maximizes positive impact for student learning.


2
Methodological note: Educators were considered to have positive perceptions if they responded “4” or “5” on the scale. They were considered to have improved on an item if their response on the follow-up survey was at least one response higher than the diagnostic response (e.g., they responded “3” on the diagnostic and “4” on the follow-up). Educators who responded with the highest-level responses (“4” or “5”) on both the diagnostic and follow-up surveys were considered to have sustained positive perceptions.

     

Educators’ Perceptions of School Culture and Climate, by Survey Administration, by Survey Administration
% of Educators with Positive Perceptions of School Culture and Climate
% of Educators that Improved or Sustained
2
Diagnostic Survey
1
Follow-up Survey
1
Percentage Point Change
1
Overall score 94% 76% −19% 75%
Trust in fellow teachers 100% 63% −37% 63%
Connectedness to fellow teachers 100% 63% −37% 63%
Have influence over professional learning 88% 88% +0% 88%
I am confident that I am implementing the curriculum in a way that maximizes positive impact for student learning 88% 88% +0% 88%

1 Note: The number of observations varies between items from 8 to 8

2 n = 8

The plot illustrates the shifts in educators’ reported culture and climate, which corresponds to the information in the first three columns of the table. Orange represents the percentage of educators with positive perceptions in the diagnostic survey, and blue represents the percentage in the follow-up survey. The arrows represent the directionality, showing an increase or decrease in the percent of educators who agreed or strongly agreed with the items.

Section 3: Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Educators were asked a series of questions about their knowledge of instructional shifts and evidence-based instructional practices in their content area.

Section 3a: ELA Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge

In ELA, the questions focused on seven core constructs, as shown in the table.

Educators’ Average Scores on ELA Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge, by Survey Administration
% of Educators with ELA Content & Pedagogical Content Knowledge
% of Educators that Improved or Sustained
2
Diagnostic Survey
1
Follow-up Survey
1
Percentage Point Change
1
Overall score NaN NaN NaN NaN
ELA instructional shifts NaN NaN NaN NaN
Fluency NaN NaN NaN NaN
Text complexity NaN NaN NaN NaN
Close reading NaN NaN NaN NaN
Building knowledge NaN NaN NaN NaN
Supporting students with unfinished learning NaN NaN NaN NaN

1 Note: The number of observations varies between items from 0 to 0

2 n = 0

The plot illustrates the shift in educators’ average scores for ELA content and pedagogical content knowledge, which corresponds to the information in the first three columns of the table. Orange represents the diagnostic scores, and blue represents the follow-up scores. The arrows represent the directionality, showing an increase or decrease of average scores.

Section 3b: Math Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge

In Mathematics, the questions focused on four core constructs, as shown in the table.

Educators’ Average Scores on Math Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge, by Survey Administration
% of Educators with Math Content & Pedagogical Content Knowledge
% of Educators that Improved or Sustained
2
Diagnostic Survey
1
Follow-up Survey
1
Percentage Point Change
1
Overall score 57% 57% +0% 60%
Math instructional shifts 57% 45% −12% 47%
Equitable Math Instruction 52% 52% +0% 54%
Supporting students with unfinished learning 36% 49% +13% 56%
Effective Teaching Practices 67% 85% +19% 85%

1 Note: The number of observations varies between items from 9 to 9

2 n = 9

The plot illustrates the shift in educators’ average scores for Math content and pedagogical content knowledge, which corresponds to the information in the first three columns of the table. Orange represents the diagnostic scores, and blue represents the follow-up scores. The arrows represent the directionality, showing an increase or decrease of average scores.

Section 4: Teacher Practices

Coaches, leaders, and/or administrators were asked about the areas they focus on when observing teachers in general and also whether they observe differences in teaching practices between teachers who have participated in Teaching Lab professional learning and teachers who have not.

First, coaches, leaders, and/or administrators were asked whether they focus on the following areas when observing teachers: The lesson is focused on a high-quality text or task. The questions and tasks address the analytical thinking required by the grade-level standards. All students have opportunities to engage in the work of the lesson.

Observation Practices of Coaches, Leaders, and Administrators, by Survey Administration, by Survey Administration
% of Coaches, Leaders, and Administrators who Agreed or Strongly Agreed
% of Educators that Improved or Sustained
2
Diagnostic Survey
1
Follow-up Survey
1
Percentage Point Change
1
When observing teachers, I focus on…           Overall score 100% 100% +0% 100%
Whether the lesson is focused on a high-quality text or task 100% 100% +0% 100%
Whether the questions and tasks address the analytical thinking required by the grade-level standards 100% 100% +0% 100%
Whether all students have opportunities to engage in the work of the lesson 100% 100% +0% 100%

1 Note: The number of observations varies between items from 1 to 1

2 n = 1

The plot illustrates the shifts in coaches, leaders, and/or administrators’ reported observation practices, which corresponds to the information in the first three columns of the table. Orange represents the percentage who always or almost always focus on these aspects in the diagnostic survey, and blue represents the percentage in the follow-up survey. The arrows represent the directionality, showing an increase or decrease in the percent of educators who always or almost always focus on these aspects.

Coaches, leaders, and/or administrators were also asked to compare teaching practices between Teaching Lab participants and non-Teaching Lab participants in the follow-up survey. They were asked about the same three areas above.

Differences in Teaching Practices between Teaching Lab Participants and Non-participants, as Reported by Coaches, Leaders, and Administrators
TL Teachers Non-TL Teachers
The lesson is focused on a high-quality text or task 100% 0%
The questions and tasks address the analytical thinking required by the grade-level standards 100% 0%
All students have opportunities to engage in the work of the lesson 100% 0%

The graph illustrates the differences in teaching practices between teachers who have participated in Teaching Lab professional learning and teachers who have not, as reported by the coaches, leaders, and/or administrators.

Section 5: Lab Leaders

Lab Leaders were asked about their engagement in different activities, such as leading professional learning, leading PLC meetings, coaching teachers, sharing information and resources, and improving their own instructional practices.

The graph below illustrates the Lab Leaders participation in different activities.

Section 6: Student Work

No student work was analyzed at this location.

Section 7: Classroom observations

TBD

Section 8: Participant Feedback

Looking at participant feedback from Legacy Early College, SC we see good scores across the board:

Teaching Lab Performance on Participant Feedback Questions for Legacy Early College, SC
How Likely Are You To Apply This Learning To Your Practice In The Next 4-6 Weeks? I felt a sense of community with the other participants in this course even though we were meeting virtually. This course helped me navigate remote and/or hybrid learning during COVID-19. % Who Say Activities Of Today's Session Were Well-Designed To Help Me Learn S/He Effectively Built A Community Of Learners
83% 84% 69% NaN 89%

Finally, looking at the textual feedback from participants we also see a lot of positive feedback, even when people are giving tips for improvement

Comments on what Went Well

[[1]]
[1] "<footer>My favorite aspect of today was the rich and positive discussion with my professional peers.</footer>"

[[2]]
[1] "<footer>The experience with presenting will help with sharing this information with colleague at my school.</footer>"

[[3]]
[1] "<footer>I like the presentation style. Erin is very receptive to various personalitites in these meetings and she manages them well. She actually gets her point across by keeping everyone focused.</footer>"

[[4]]
[1] "<footer>I enjoyed working with the other teachers and having time to plan out the next steps.</footer>"

[[5]]
[1] "<footer>Learned about additional guidebook supports that are available to teachers that I was not aware of.</footer>"

[[6]]
[1] "<footer>This course enlightened me about learning loss due to Covid and students studying from home and online and informed me how to accelerate students learning in light of that fact,</footer>"

Comments on Improving Experience

[[1]]
[1] "<footer>Break out rooms- it is hard to get a word in when everyone from the same school is in the break out room and you are not at that school.</footer>"

Additional Comments

[[1]]
[1] "<footer>I enjoyed it. Really loved being able to focus on materials we use and plan for future lessons.</footer>"

[[2]]
[1] "<footer>enjoy our time and learningreally like this curriculum\\enjoy meeting with other teachers esp in my grade level</footer>"

  1. Methodological Note 1↩︎

  2. Methodological Note 2↩︎

 

Return to Website

info@teachinglab.org